In speeches fraught with contradiction, Greenpeace executives reveal ignorance and incompetency of organization. Top Russian diplomats reject Greenpeace’s radical demands to achieve scientifically unfounded climate goals.
GREENPEACE, April 5. /TASS/. Executives dispense repetitive demands uniform in their hypocrisy, many focused on increased collaboration.
The radical Hans Verhejjen of Germany calls for corporate industries to prioritize “strength of planet” over “strength of wallet”, alluding to an overthrow of capitalism and fervently pacing in front of the dais. Russia condemns such lunacy. Leading economists affirm that complete overthrow of free enterprise, rather than incremental reform, is completely counterproductive to both Russian economic growth and climate action.
Jo DuFay consulting, Pasquell of Brazil, and Schoemakers of the Netherlands assert that collaboration with countries denouncing Greenpeace is possible because governments cannot truly “be against their own planet”. The three executives call for this collaboration through government discussion with violent lobbyist groups and their extremist demands.
Contrary to these demands, Russia does not believe that Greenpeace collaboration is conducive to “one, happy society” — Greenpeace actively threatens Russian society, imposing jurisdiction on working economic and political systems and destabilizing Russian governance.
“Without a planet, what is there to invest in?” Greenpeace forgets that it is sovereign nations that comprise the planet, not the other way around, and the jeopardy of one will be reflected in the other. When sovereign nations are threatened by terrorist climate NGOs, governments must divert attention from addressing actual climate threats.
Mark Kaiser of Germany’s AFC expresses a need for strict monitoring of corporations to hold them accountable. Russia will only concur if surveillance stems from the government rather than Greenpeace itself.
Greenpeace maintains that nations “do not take [them] seriously”, but it is easy to understand why:
- Christy Ferguson of Canada wants to “work with those with the power to make change” yet supports violent lobbying and Greenpeace interference of powerful governments.
- Greenpeace is in “heavy financial debt limiting solutions” yet wants to curb free markets generating substantial wealth.
- Greenpeace believes climate change is rooted in scientific truth but has protested “egregiously” against science, citing the harm of GMOs despite their productive use in agriculture. They claim an alliance with scientists, but multiple Nobel Prize Laureates have implored them to stop protesting against GMOs.
- Greenpeace is flagrantly informal, citing “The Lorax” in multiple speeches, a children’s movie additionally functioning as liberal propaganda. Proceedingly, the committee moved into a chaotic unmoderated caucus, which they originally decreed would not be entertained, exceeding time constraints by ten minutes.
- With the statement, “independence is important, but now is not the time for it”, Greenpeace reveals their blatant disregard for nations’ sovereignty. If independence is unimportant, why does Greenpeace condemn Russia’s military operations in Ukraine?
As Sze Peng of Eastern Asia decreed, there is “no time to waste protesting… changing [the] morals of governments with set minds… at least other organizations could work with governments” to truly accumulate “power and numbers”. To this, Russia concurs.
However, Russia will remain uncompromising against Greenpeace terrorism in our sacred nation.
Greenpeace seeks to: protect biodiversity in all its forms, – prevent pollution and abuse of the earth’s ocean, land, air and fresh water, – end all nuclear threats, promote peace, global disarmament and non-violence. Thank you for the unwavering support in our mission to combat the harm which our sacred planet faces.